Oversizing Consideration of Proximal Stent Graft in Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients Undergoing Emergent Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Consideration for oversizing the proximal stent graft is suggested in endovascular aortic repair. However, a special recommendation for the proximal oversizing ratio (OSR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is ambiguous. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different degrees of the proximal oversizing ratio (OSR) on risk of type IA endoleak (TIAEL) in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients with rAAA undergoing emergency endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Our study included 134 rAAA patients undergoing emergent EVAR, and we did not observe a significant association between hemodynamic instability and risk of T1AEL (HR 3.89, 95%CI 0.40-37.75, p = 0.24). All three T1AELs in the hemodynamically unstable subgroup were observed in patients with OSR ≤ 30%, but no significant difference was found regarding T1AEL between patients with OSR > 30% and OSR ≤ 30% (0.00% vs. 11.11%, p = 0.19). As for hemodynamically stable patients, OSR > 20% was associated with a significantly decreased risk of T1AEL (HR 0.03, 95%CI 0.01-0.53, p = 0.016). In conclusion, a proximal OSR > 20% is associated with a decreased risk of T1AEL in hemodynamically stable patients, while an OSR > 30% did not add an additional advantage of lowering the risk of T1AEL in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Vascular complications of ProGlide versus Prostar in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the vascular complications of ProGlide and Prostar in percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched in July 2022 for studies that compared the vascular complications of ProGlide and Prostar for percutaneous closure in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The primary outcome was major vascular complications and the secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, types of access-site vascular complications, device failure, and additional intervention. Estimates of relative effects were pooled to generate ORs and their 95 per cent c.i. using a random-effects model. The risk of bias in non-randomized comparative studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions ('ROBINS-I') tool. RESULTS: Nine studies were identified and a total of 7529 patients were included. Among them, 4144 patients received ProGlide and 3385 received Prostar. The pooled data showed that the risk of major vascular complications was significantly lower with ProGlide versus Prostar (OR 0.50, 95 per cent c.i. 0.32 to 0.78). Regarding the types of vascular complications, vascular trauma was the most common complication and the risk was similar between groups (OR 1.02, 95 per cent c.i. 0.55 to 1.91). ProGlide had a lower risk of bleeding complications (OR 0.46, 95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.94), but a higher risk of ischaemia complications (OR 1.90, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 3.27). The risk of device failure was lower in the ProGlide group (OR 0.45, 95 per cent c.i. 0.21 to 0.95). Both groups had a similar risk of having additional interventions for vascular complications (OR 1.02, 95 per cent c.i. 0.75 to 1.39). The use of ProGlide was associated with a lower risk of additional surgical treatments (OR 0.52, 95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 0.80), but a higher risk of endovascular treatments (OR 2.69, 95 per cent c.i. 1.29 to 5.63). CONCLUSION: In percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures, ProGlide has superior safety and efficacy when compared with Prostar; it is associated with fewer major vascular complications and device failures. The vascular complications of ProGlide are more likely to be dealt with using endovascular treatments than surgical treatments.

Ultrasound-guided proximal external aortic compression in a vascular trauma patient.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency treatment of patients with severe subphrenic vascular trauma often adopts resuscitative thoracotomy or endovascular balloon. This case report proposes a non-invasive method to treat patients with vascular trauma, mainly through ultrasound-guided positioning of the proximal aorta and applying pressure to occlude the aorta and limit the distal blood flow, using bedside ultrasound to achieve accurate compression, continuous monitoring of its efficacy, and early detection of the recovery of autonomic circulation in patients with cardiac arrest. METHODS: We introduced a case of left iliac artery injury caused by a knife wound and subsequent cardiac arrest.Results We tried to externally compress the proximal aorta under bedside US guidance to achieve and maintain the recovery of the autonomic circulation. This allowed the patient to be transferred from the emergency department to the operating room. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrated that ultrasound-guided proximal external aortic compression can be used as a bridge for further treatment of patients with vascular trauma, such as resuscitative thoracotomy or endoaortic balloon or covered stent occlusion.

Intravenous Lobular Capillary Hemangioma of the Neck: A Report of 2 Cases.

Background: Intravenous lobular capillary hemangioma (IVLCH) of the neck is a kind of rare benign tumor of vein. Purpose: In this paper, we report two female patients who were hospitalized because of neck masses. Results: The tumors in the neck veins of our patients were white oval masses with pedicle, clearly defined and of different sizes. Their immunohistochemical staining results showed CD31 (+), CD34 (+), SMA (+), ERG (+). The pathological diagnosis was intravenous lobular capillary hemangioma. Conclusions: Due to the location, morphology and immunohistochemistry, This lesion needs to be distinguished from other intravascular lesions such as thrombus, hemangiosarcoma and papillary endothelial hyperplasia.

Fast-Track Management of Concurrent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Scheduled for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of fast-track management of concurrent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm scheduled for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who received EVAR from January 2011 to December 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score (PS)-matched analysis was used to balance the baseline between the fast-track and standard control (EVAR without significant coronary artery disease) groups. Effects of fast-track management on short-term and midterm outcomes were evaluated via Cox proportional hazard regression and logistic regression analyses with corresponding hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), respectively. RESULTS: The study included 669 patients (73 fast-track and 596 standard control). Compared with the standard control group, no significant difference was found regarding major adverse cardiac events (HR 0.78, 95% CI [0.36, 1.68], p=0.519), overall mortality (HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.25, 1.55], p=0.315), and 30-day major hemorrhage events (OR 1.01, 95% CI [0.99, 1.03], p=0.514). The results were consistent in the PS-matched cohorts regarding major adverse cardiac events (HR 0.57, 95% CI [0.25, 1.29], p=0.176), overall mortality (HR 0.43, 95% CI [0.17, 1.11], p=0.820), and 30-day major hemorrhage events (OR 1.00, 95% CI [0.05, 10.61], p=0.999). Similar results were found in the subgroup analyses concerning fast-track management of 2-week intervals and patients with high age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS: Under appropriate perioperative care, shortening the time interval between PCI and EVAR to 1 month, or even 2 weeks, seemed to be safe and effective. Short-term and midterm cardiovascular and survival outcomes were comparable with patients who underwent standard EVAR without significant coronary artery disease.

Quality of Life Status and Influencing Factors Among Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Objective: The objective of the study was to describe the quality of life (QoL) status and investigate the influencing factors of QoL among patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A retrospective analysis at a single center was performed, and the clinical data of 161 patients with DVT admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2019 to June 2020 were collected with the Villalta scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ). The relationship between QoL and influencing factors, including characteristics, course of DVT, postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), psychological status, and behaviors, was analyzed by Student's t-test, analysis of variance and multiple linear regression. Results: A total of 161 patients who completed all the questionnaires between 2019 and 2020 were included, and 110 patients (68%) were male. The mean QoL score acquired by the CIVIQ scale was 74.18±8.44, and the results showed significant differences between patients of different ages, genders, behaviors and psychological statuses (P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that age (P = 0.024), negative mood (P < 0.001), CCI index (P < 0.001), PTS (P < 0.001) and regular exercise (P = 0.002) influenced the CIVIQ scale evaluation model, in which exercise regularly was a protective factor for QoL, and age, negative mood, CCI index and PTS were risk factors for QoL. Conclusion: The QoL of DVT patients was impaired and associated with age, mood, CCI index and PTS. Regular exercise is beneficial for improving the quality of life of DVT patients.

Cardiac Doppler Parameters and Progress in Clinical Manifestation of Primary Lower Extremity Varicose Veins: A Prospective Study in China.

Objective: To investigate the features of cardiac Doppler parameters in patients with primary lower extremity varicose veins in China. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective statistical analysis of cardiac Doppler parameters between 129 Chinese patients with varicose veins and normal controls. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between cardiac Doppler and the progress or severity of lower extremity varicose veins. Results: Compared with normal controls, patients with primary varicose veins had significantly lower early mitral and tricuspid diastolic inflow and annular velocities (E- and e'-waves), significantly higher late mitral and tricuspid diastolic inflow and annular velocities (A- and a'-waves), significantly higher mitral systolic annular velocities (s'-wave), and significantly lower mitral and tricuspid E/A ratio. There was no significant association between deep venous reflux (DVR) of the lower extremities and cardiac Doppler parameters. The relationship between Clinical Etiological Anatomical Pathophysiological (CEAP) clinical class and cardiac Doppler parameters showed on that: In comparison with normal control, all cardiac Doppler parameters of C2 clinical class patients were basically unchanged, but the cardiac Doppler parameters of the C3 or higher CEAP class patients changed. Hence, we found a potential CEAP grade cut-off value (C3) linked to statistical changes in cardiac Doppler parameters. Conclusion: Cardiac Doppler parameters in patients with primary varicose veins could indeed be different from those of normal people, especially for C3 class or higher CEAP clinical class patients. Therefore, for those patients, pre-operative echocardiography can be used to evaluate cardiac hemodynamic changes, but large-scale clinical promotion requires further large sample studies.

No Benefit of Wearing Compression Stockings after Endovenous Thermal Ablation of Varicose Veins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether compression stockings were necessary after endovenous thermal ablation of varicose veins. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database, were searched from inception to 10 March 2021 to identify all the related trials. METHODS: Random or fixed effects models were used to generate pooled mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data, and related 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The quality of evidence was graded with a specific tool (GRADEpro GDT) from the GRADE working group. RESULTS: A total of seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 1 146 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Wearing compression stockings was correlated with lower post-operative pain scores from a 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (MD -8.00; 95% CI -12.01 - -3.99; p < .001). No difference was observed between wearing compression stockings or not in quality of life (SMD 0.45; 95% CI 0.14 - 1.04), major complications (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.26 -1.59), target vein occlusion rates (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.02), or time to return to work (MD -0.43; 95% CI 1.06 - 0.19). CONCLUSION: After endovenous thermal ablation of varicose veins, wearing compression stockings was not associated with a better outcome except for mild pain relief. Post-operative compression stockings may be unnecessary after endovenous thermal ablation.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Endovascular and Open Repair for Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infective native aortic aneurysms (INAAs). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles reporting OSR and/or EVAR repair of INAA. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Moga-Score. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled measures. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies were included, with 22 studies reporting OSR alone, 6 studies reporting EVAR alone and 6 comparative studies for INAAs. The pooled estimates of infection-related complications (IRCs) were 8.2% (95% CI 4.9%-12.2%) in OSR cohort and 23.2% (95% CI 16.1%-31.0%) in EVAR cohort. EVAR was associated with a significantly increased risk of IRCs compared with OSR during follow-up (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.7). As for survival outcomes, the summary estimate rate of all cause 30-day, 3-month and 1-year mortality in OSR cohort were 11.7% (95% CI 7.7%-16.1%), 21.6% (95%CI 16.3%-27.4%) and 28.3% (95% CI 20.5%-36.7%; I2=50.47%), respectively. For EVAR cohort, the summary estimate rate of all cause 30-day, 3-month and 1-year mortality were 4.9% (95% CI 1.1%-10.4%), 9.4% (95% CI 2.7%-18.7%) and 22.2% (95% CI 12.4%-33.7%), respectively. EVAR was associated with a significantly decreased of 30-day mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6). However, no difference was found between EVAR and OSR in 3-month (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0-1.1), 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.1) or aneurysm-related mortality (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.5-3.9). Moreover, no difference of incidence of reintervention was observed (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.7; I2=53.7%) between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR could provide better short-term survival than OSR in patients with INAAs. However, patients undergoing EVAR suffered from higher risks of IRCs. EVAR could be considered as an alternative for low-risk patients with well-controlled infections or patients considered high-risk for open reconstruction.

A narrative review of the quality of life scales specific for chronic venous diseases.

ABSTRACT: To review the various quality of life (QoL) scales specific for chronic venous diseases (CVDs) and provide guidance and a reference for researchers to select the ideal measurement scale before studying QoL in patients with CVDs.The EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, Wanfang, and CNKI databases were searched for the keywords "vein," "quality of life," and "scale/questionnaire," and various scales used to measure QoL in patients with CVDs. The QoL aspects were investigated and researched, and then, the search results were screened and summarized.A total of 10 major scales related to the QoL in patients with CVDs were included. The scales differed in dimension, reliability, validity, scoring method, evaluation method, and scope of application.The investigator should select the chronic venous disease QoL scale according to the research purpose and subjects, and then implement the scale to compare the specific aspects of QoL in patients with different CVDs.

Effect of limb oversizing on the risk of type Ib endoleak in patients after endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the association between the degree of limb oversizing and the risk of type Ib endoleak (TIBEL) in different types of iliac landing zones after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with bifurcated and limb endografts in an academic center. The main exposure was the degree of limb oversizing. The primary outcome was the occurrence of TIBELs. The secondary outcomes included limb occlusion, reintervention, and overall survival. Subgroup analyses stratified by ectatic and normal iliac landing zones were performed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and sensitivity analyses using marginal structure model were conducted to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 750 patients with 1500 iliac limb endografts were included in our study (817 limbs with oversizing of ≤10% and 683 with oversizing >10%). The median 1-year freedom from TIBEL was 98.9% (interquartile range [IQR], 98.0%-99.8%) for limbs with oversizing of ≤10% and 99.6% (IQR, 99.0%-100%) for limbs with oversizing >10%. The median 3-year freedom from TIBEL was 95.6% (IQR, 93.1%-98.1%) and 98.2% (IQR, 96.5%-99.9%) for oversizing ≤10% and >10%, respectively. We found that limb oversizing >10% was associated with a significantly decreased risk of TIBEL (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.76) in the overall population. After stratification by ectatic iliac landing zone, we found that limb oversizing >10% was associated with a significantly decreased risk of TIBEL in the ectatic iliac landing zones (adjusted HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.88). However, no significant difference was found in the limb endografts landing in normal iliac arteries (adjusted HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.13-1.45). In the subgroup of normal iliac arteries, we observed a significantly increased risk of limb occlusion in the limbs with distal oversizing >15% compared with the limbs with distal oversizing of ≤15% (adjusted HR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.68-12.91). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate limb oversizing >10% was associated with a significantly decreased risk of TIBEL in limbs with ectatic iliac landing zones. However, no additional benefit was observed for oversizing >10% in limb grafts landing in normal iliac arteries. Furthermore, excessive limb oversizing (>15%) in normal iliac landing zones can be associated with an increased risk of limb occlusion.

Editor's Choice - Mid Term Outcomes of Crossed Limb vs. Standard Limb Configuration in Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Propensity Score Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare mid term outcomes between crossed limb (CL) and standard limb (SL) configuration in patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: This was a comparative cohort study. Eligible patients who underwent EVAR between September 2011 and March 2019 in a tertiary academic centre were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the demographic, anatomical and operative baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcome was adverse limb events including type IB endoleak (T1BEL), type III endoleak, and limb occlusion. Cox proportional hazards regression and marginal structural model were performed to compare time to event outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 729 patients (194 CL and 535 SL) with a median follow up of 34 months (interquartile range 16 - 62 months). The weighted analyses revealed no significant difference between CL and SL EVAR in terms of adverse limb events, type IA endoleak (T1AEL), type II endoleak (T2EL), re-intervention, and overall survival. In the subgroup analysis of large aneurysm sac, the CL configuration was associated with a significantly decreased risk of T1BEL (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12 - 0.78, p = .014). Similar results were also observed in the subgroup of tortuous iliac arteries (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 - 0.81, p = .017). After stratification by severe neck angulation, no significant difference was found between CL and SL EVAR for T1AEL, but the CL configuration was associated with a significantly increased risk of re-intervention (HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.31 - 5.51, p = .007). In addition, a trend towards a higher risk of adverse limb events in the CL group with severely angulated proximal neck was observed. CONCLUSION: CL configuration in EVAR is safe and may be associated with a lower risk of T1BEL in patients with a large aneurysm sac or tortuous iliac arteries. However, it should be applied cautiously to aneurysms with a severely angulated neck due to the potentially higher risk of re-intervention.

Frailty as a predictor of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of frailty assessed by the modified Frailty Index (mFI) on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in the elderly patients after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients who underwent EVAR in a tertiary hospital. The main exposure was frailty status assessed by the mFI. The primary outcomes were 30-day and long-term MACCE. The predictive ability of the mFI was compared with the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) using net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) statistics. RESULTS: Of 749 participants, 134 (17.89%) were identified as frail and 185 (24.70%) as prefrail. Thirteen patients (1.74%) were lost in follow-up after surgery, and the median length of follow-up was 32.00 months (range, 15.00-59.25 months). Frailty was associated with a significantly increased risk of 30-day MACCE (adjusted odds ratio OR, 14.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.59-46.04; P < .0001) and longer intensive care unit stay (adjusted odds ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.17-5.07; P = .0176). As for long-term outcomes, both frailty and prefrailty were associated significantly increased risks of MACCE after EVAR (prefrail: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.71; 95% CI, 1.12-2.61; frail: adjusted HR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.86-6.10). When considering death as a competing risk, we also observed a significant association between frailty and cardiac and cerebrovascular events (adjusted HR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.06-8.15). In addition, frailty was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.28-2.90). Compared with the RCRI, the mFI had better discrimination in predicting 30-day MACCE (IDI: 0.225; 95% CI, 0.018-0.431; P = .033; NRI: 0.225; 95% CI, 0.023-0.427; P = .029) and long-term MACCE (IDI: 0.056; 95% CI, 0.018-0.128; P = .013; NRI: 0.237; 95% CI, 0.136-0.359; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessed by the mFI may serve as a useful predictor of both short-term and long-term MACCE in elderly patients after EVAR, with improved discrimination and reclassification abilities compared with the RCRI.

Meta-analysis of outcomes after intentional coverage of celiac artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of intentional coverage of the celiac artery (CA) during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting coverage of CA during TEVAR. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed using the Moga score and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A random effects model was used to pool the estimates. A meta-analysis was performed with investigation of the following outcomes: visceral ischemia, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), stroke, endoleak, reintervention, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies with 171 patients were included. The summary estimate rate of visceral ischemia events was 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-8.9%; I2 = 4.1%). The incidence of stroke and SCI was 0.2% (95% CI, 0%-3.4%; I2 = 0%) and 3% (95% CI, 0.3%-7.4%; I2 = 6.1%). The rate of endoleak during the follow-up period was 24.1% (95% CI, 14.3%-35.1%; I2 = 20.0%). The reintervention rate was 13.6% (95% CI, 4.4%-25.7%; I2 = 66.0%). The 30-day and 1-year mortality were 2.9% (95% CI, 0.3%-7.2%; I2 = 6.2%) and 15.2% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.9%; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with complex thoracic aortic pathologies deemed at high risk for open reconstruction, TEVAR with intentional coverage of the CA is a safe and feasible option to extend the distal sealing zone with acceptable rates of visceral ischemia, SCI, type II endoleak from the CA, and 30-day mortality.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following One versus Two Stage Hybrid Repair of Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: For thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA), it is unclear whether it is better to perform hybrid repair in one (single) or two stages (staged). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of single vs. staged hybrid repair of TAAA. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Databases (1 January 1994 to 11 May 2020) were searched for studies on hybrid repair of TAAA. Cohort studies and case series reporting outcomes of single and staged hybrid repair of TAAA were eligible for inclusion. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale and an 18 item tool were used to assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included post-operative complications, overall survival, and other mid term events. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. RESULTS: A total of 37 studies was included in the meta-analysis. The quality assessment of the included studies suggested low or moderate risk of bias. The pooled estimates for aneurysm rupture and death during stage interval were 2% (95% CI 0%-4%, I2 = 0%) and 4% (95% CI 2%-7%, I2 = 0%), respectively. Single repair was associated with a significantly higher 30 day risk of death when compared with patients who completed staged procedures successfully (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36-5.12, I2 = 0%). Staged repair also had lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (single: 10%, 95% CI 5%-16%; staged: 2%, 95% CI 0%-5%) and intestinal complications (single: 15%, 95% CI 8%-25%; staged: 3%, 95% CI 1%-6%). For mid term outcomes, single and staged repair had comparable 12 month overall survival, aneurysm related mortality, rate of re-intervention, and graft patency. CONCLUSION: Two stage hybrid repair may represent a better choice for patients with controlled risk of aneurysm rupture, because it can provide lower 30 day mortality risks, MACE, and intestinal complications, as well as comparable mid term outcomes. Randomised controlled trials are needed to ascertain the effect of repair staging in patients for elective TAAA.